If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant around July 2012, in the Han River located near Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, caused the morale by the victim B, and is in preparation for civil and criminal lawsuits, etc., the defective victim can solve the case only when he/she is in charge of the high-ranking police and the prosecution.

It is necessary to pay 3 million won to the police and the prosecution for each three million won, and appoint an attorney-at-law to deal with the case well, so it is necessary to pay a total of 13 million won with the police and the prosecution's expense and the attorney-at-law fee.

On the other hand, the defendant made a false statement in cash, but even if he received money from the injured party, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to use the case at the police or prosecutor's expense.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was delivered KRW 9 million to the injured party on July 30, 2012.

As a result, the defendant by deceiving the victim, by deceiving 9 million won from the victim, and at the same time, received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the affairs handled by the public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud) of the relevant Act on the facts constituting an offense, and Article 111 (1) of the Act (the point of receiving money and valuables under the pretext of solicitation related to the affairs of public officials) of the Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;