However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, in around 00:50 on November 4, 2017, at the convenience store C, did not satis in coffee satis, among others, to the victim D (38 tax) who is an employee, “no satis unless there is any satis.”

“.....” and “..........” from the injured party,

whether or not

“Along with the word “,” the victim’s head was assaulted on one occasion by culp satis ( approximately 30 cm in length, 1000 mm in capacity) of the dangerous article, which is favorable to the dangerous article.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;