On April 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than four months at the Seoul Northern District Court for the same year.

6.5. The enforcement of the sentence was completed in the Eastern Detention Center in Seoul.

"2017 Highest 2750"

1. On June 25, 2017, around 08:00 on June 25, 2017, the Defendant was provided with alcoholic beverages and food equivalent to KRW 46,000 in total amount of the market price from the victim, who was an employee of the above restaurant, even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the food cost.

2. Under the influence of alcohol at the above date, at the above place, the Defendant interfered with the victim E, who is an employee of the above restaurant, with the singing stored in his mobile phone without any particular reason, and without any particular reason, interfered with the victim’s restaurant management work by force, such as “the instant mar head h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h., h., h., h., h., sof., sof., sof., sof., sof., the Defendant h.e., the

around 08:15 on June 24, 2017, the Defendant provided a bath to himself/herself at a restaurant operated by the victim G located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on June 24, 2017, and the victim provided a bath under the influence of alcohol.

It was damaged by misunderstanding that about 20 of the market price that had been located at this place was sealed by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. The screen of the screen of a video closure;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry about criminal history, results of screening prisoners, and application of the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to property) and choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The Defendant’s reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes have not been much after release on June 5, 2017, as indicated in the reasoning of the lower judgment.