, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s co-offendered Defendants d, E, F, G, H, H, J, K, L, M, N,O, and P. From August 28, 2014 to August 17:00 of the same day, Defendant B and J using 52 L in the house of R located in Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q G GW from around 14:00 to 17:00 on August 28, 2014, Defendant B andJ used 3,000 won, five points, 2,000 won, and 3,000 won, and 3,000 won, 7 points, coming up on the floor and divided them into two plaques, and the remainder of the 12 members except the above 3 members, added the remaining 90,000 won number to the total 50,000 won, and discarded the remaining 50,000 won number to each column.

As a result, the Defendants habitually stuffed.

2. Defendant C’s crime

A. Even though the Defendant was aware of the fact that 15 persons, such as A, etc. under paragraph (1) are gambling at the time and place under paragraph (1), the Defendant provided the above 15 coffees, tobacco, and cups, thereby aiding and abetting them by facilitating their gambling.

B. On August 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00, at the investigation station and the criminal team office located in the Gyeongnam-gun, and (b) at the criminal team office, it is difficult to perceive the commission of a crime on several occasions; (c) he/she is under interrogation by S, etc. due to the suspicion of the crime of gambling; (d) after being investigated, he/she entered “T in the statement column among the interrogation protocol prepared by the above police officers; and (e) affixed his/her seal to the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the above police officers; and (e) submitted the forged suspect interrogation protocol to S as mentioned above.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant forged his signature in T's name without authority, and exercised a forged private signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.