A. The judgment of the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, although the Defendant did not know the victim's timber, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (the amount of KRW 300,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, namely, ① the victim’s investigative agency and the court of the lower court, which correspond to the facts charged in the instant case, consistently provide credibility, and ② the victim’s wife E also took the victim’s bath while taking the victim’s bath in the court of the lower court.

진술하고 있어 피해자의 진술에 부합하는 점, ③ 이 사건 현장 아래층에 살고 있던 목격자 F는 평소와 달리 쿵쿵거리는 소리가 나고 시끄러워서 현장에 올라가 보았다고 진술하고 있어 당시 피고인과 피해자 사이에 물리적 접촉이 있었을 것으로 보이는 점, ④ 이 사건 직후 촬영한 피해자의 팔과 목에 폭행의 흔적으로 보이는 붉은 자국이 남아 있는 점 등을 종합하면 피고인이 피해자의 목을 잡아 폭행하였다는 이 사건 공소사실을 넉넉히 인정할 수 있으므로, 원심판결에 피고인이 지적하는 바와 같이 사실을 오인하여 판결에 영향을 미친 위법이 있다고

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the degree of assault in this case’s judgment on the unfair argument of sentencing is minor, the defendant found the victim to not give the victim a tight wage, and the defendant appears to have caused the crime of this case to be contingent. However, the defendant denied the crime and did not agree with the victim, and the defendant has committed the same crime several times.