사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The name-free winners are telephone financial fraud officers who acquire money by means of the 'Sphishing' method, such as by misrepresenting an unspecified victim to transfer or withdraw the money in the account of low interest rate exchange loan, etc. by misrepresenting to a financial institution, etc.
On September 9, 2020, the Defendant proposed the collection of loans from a person who was not the name of the foregoing organization (hereinafter “B team leader”) (hereinafter “the above organization’s name”) to receive direct damage from the victim of the crime of telephone finance fraud according to the direction of the person who was not the name, and was aware that the Defendant served as the so-called “collection of cash” to transfer the remainder, excluding his share of money, to the account designated by the person who was not the name of the victim. However, the Defendant conspired in sequence with the telephone financial aid staff, including the non-name victim, in order to do so.
1. On September 10, 2020, a person who is infinites the victim C by telephone at a place where it is impossible to identify the place on September 10, 202, and misrepresents the victim C with D bank staff and provides loans at low interest.
In order to obtain a loan, existing loans to E, Enterprise Bank, and F shall be repaid.
The thesis, which is assigned to the staff, made a false statement to the effect that the loans are repaid in cash.
However, in fact, the person who was not a financial institution employee was not an employee, and there was no intention or ability to make a loan to the victim at low interest.
On September 10, 2020, by deceiving the victim and inducing the victim to go up to the “H credits” located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 10, 202, and the defendant deceivings the victim in such a manner as if he were an employee sent in E even if he was not an employee E, and then, he was issued KRW 23,00,000 in cash from the damaged party on the same place.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with a person without name, deceiving the victim, and 23.