If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On February 3, 2013, around 18:26, the Defendant posted a letter “CPC” located in the Internet net “CPC” located in the Government-si B, stating that the Defendant was “Neinaco,” and that the Defendant was “Neco,” despite the lack of intent or ability to sell NAP,” and that it was “Neco,” regardless of the absence of intention or capacity to sell NAP.

The Defendant informed the victim AP of the post office account number (AR) in the name of Q, and did not send 150,000 won to the victim for sales proceeds, which was promised to receive 150,000 won from the victim, and acquired the above 150,000 won from the victim.

2. On February 3, 2013, at the same place as the Defendant posted a notice stating that “Ninna car page” was “Ninna,” and that fact was “Ninna,” despite the lack of intent or ability to sell the NAP,” at the same place.

The Defendant informed the victim AS of the post office account number (AR) in the name of Q, and did not send the NA which was promised to receive KRW 150,000 from the victim as sales proceeds, and instead, acquired the above KRW 150,000 from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Written statements of AP, related materials, and response materials, respectively;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes described in AS statements and remittance receipts;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;