beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.10.17 2018고단641

사기방조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The fraud fraud organization of telecommunications aiding and abetting fraud is an organization that commits a crime by misrepresenting an investigative agency and a financial institution by misrepresenting a large number of unspecified victims by telephone, and by deceiving money. It is operated in the form of a communications organization, such as a call center that instructs the solicitation and withdrawal of a passbook, a call center that manages the public offering and withdrawal of a passbook, and a general account book that manages the public offering and withdrawal of a passbook, a distribution book of a bankbook, a delivery book of a passbook for a passbook, a withdrawal book that withdraws money from the passbook to which the money was deposited. In preparation for arrest, it is operated in the form of communication with one another using a "B" of the Chinese SNS service that is difficult to track by an investigative agency.

On May 5, 2018, the Defendant reported on the Internet advertisement that the Defendant recruited high-profit tebrates on the Internet, and the Defendant, using mobile phone Mebsen mp, contacted the name influor who is the cause of the telecommunications financial fraud organization, and received a box containing the ebline card from the person in the name of the eck card and sent it to another person, and received KRW 3 to 50,000 per case.

around that time, the Defendant received international telephone from a person who was not his name, and knew that the Defendant’s opening of the box and the entry in the box was a physical card under the name of another person. The Defendant, like the entry in Section 2(a), issued to the person who pretends to be a lending company, and then deposited 6 million won in the C bank account in the name of the Defendant, and the account transaction was suspended after deposit in the C bank account in the name of the Defendant. On May 18, 2018, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the C card which the Defendant delivers was used for the criminal act of phishing, since the Financial Supervisory Commission had experience in receiving notice that the procedure for refunding the amount of damage caused by telecommunications fraud begins from the Financial Supervisory Commission’s name.

On May 23, 2018, a name-free person was called a telephone to the victim D from the ordinary land of the 2018.