2. It is recognized that the defendant is aged 72 years old, his mistake is divided.

However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving money from a driver or an insurance company by pretending to be a traffic accident, and the nature of the crime is very rough and bad, the defendant is punished by a fine, a criminal record of punishment, including a crime of attack under similar veterinary laws, the victims are not agreed upon, and there is no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the range of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the sentencing committee of the Supreme Court, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc., are considered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, and it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.