However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the mother of the victimized child C (16.2.) who has already entrusted four children other than the victimized child to the protection agency, and anyone has a duty to protect and rear the victimized child under his/her protection and supervision.

Nevertheless, the defendant, at around February 22, 2016, left damaged children to the "F Child Care Center" in the operation of D 103 103 Do 103 Do 103 Do Do 103 at Si interest, for the same year.

6. Until March 3, 200, the child victimized at the weekend did not take care of the victimized child, and the child was not paid at the expense, and the contact with the child care center was avoided, thereby neglecting the basic protection and rearing of the victimized child.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each internal investigation report (Attachment of documents, such as an application for admission of a victim submitted by a reference witness, attachment of photographs of the contents of conversation with the suspect taken from the cell phone of the reference witness, attachment of photographs of the damaged child, and taking photographs of the damaged child), and each investigation report (transfer of protect

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a family relation certificate or a summary of the case of the institution for protecting children;

1. Article 71 (1) and (2) and subparagraph 6 of Article 17 of the Act on the Place of Child’s Reinstatement of Punishment and the Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and there is no person who has the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person who is subject to special sentencing) (i.e., June to one year) (i., six months) (i.e., special sentencing) (i., a decision of sentence) (i.e., a decision of sentence] (i., a case in which the defendant was born to a child care center while leaving the child born to the child care center and neglecting his/her basic duty of care and care as his/her mother, and (ii) another four children born between South and North Korea, who were born to the defendant and the divorced, are already entrusted to the child care center for a long time due to child abuse and neglect.