When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 20:50, at the main point operated by the Victim C (37 Do) located in Yangyang-gun of Gyeonggi-do, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, breadddd the victim with the face of the victim six times in drinking, while walking about 20 times in the mouth of the victim, and caused the victim to string about 20 times in the mouth of the victim, and caused the victim to string about 20 times in the mouth of the mouth of the victim, shed the string of the snow and the string of the snow around the snow.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A photo of the damaged part;

1. The CCTV Defendant denied the charge that the victim was faced with each other in the course of a horse fighting with the victim and that the victim was not at the time of drinking or launching.

However, according to CCTV images taken at the time of the instant crime, each of the following facts can be acknowledged: the Defendant’s face is sealed or satisfed by hand (at the time of regeneration hours from 01:58 to 01:59, 04:0 to 04:04, 05:30:00 to 03:01, 04: 05:24, 05:08 to 05:09, 05:11 to 05:15), and the fact that the victimized person was injured by the Defendant at the prices around the victim’s snow during such series of assaults (see, e.g., renewable hours from 03:0 to 03:01, 04: 05:30).

Application of Statutes

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Examining CCTV images with reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant continued to assault the victim even though the victim did not resist at all, and considering the body of the victim immediately after the snow’s price was reasonable, the victim seems to have suffered considerable shock.

The CCTV images taken at the time of the crime are clear that the crime was committed, and even though the defendant himself/herself confirmed it in the court, the defendant denies the crime and did not recognize his/her mistake against the victim.

(2).