A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant

In respect of B, a sentence of punishment shall be suspended.

1. On April 9, 2015, at around 08:25, Defendant A suffered from the victim B (the age of 41) due to the problem of operating the location of stuffed machine at the workplace of F Co., Ltd., Ltd. located in Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Incheon, where the victim’s face from the back of the above company, and the victim’s face from drinking at several times due to drinking at the back of the above company’s head, etc., the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as an euse, math, and math, requiring approximately 10 weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the workplace of F Co., Ltd., as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, entered a trial with the victim A (the age of 57) for the foregoing reasons, and carried the victim’s breath from the back hole of the above company, and breaddd the victim’s breath by drinking bom, and breadd the victim’s breath, followed the victim’s breath by several times, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as a breath’s breath, in detail, required for treatment for

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement of the suspect interrogation protocol concerning B by the prosecution;

1. Description of the written diagnosis of injury (33 pages of investigation records);

1. The image of the photographic picture (the fact of No. 2 in the board);

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. A’s legal statement;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B by the prosecution (including the substitute part)

1. Description of the written diagnosis of injury (investigative records No. 24 pages);

1. Defendant B and his defense counsel asserted that Defendant B unilaterally met with A and did not take place at the time. However, Defendant B and A unilaterally did not take place, but Defendant B and A got out of the workplace upon Defendant B’s proposal. Defendant B and B got out of the workplace with an openter in accordance with Defendant B’s proposal. ② After the occurrence of the instant case, A and A taken a son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’