However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 28, 2011, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving in Drinking) at the Cheongju District Court Support on Cheongju District Court, on August 11, 2009, a person who was issued a summary order of KRW 7,00,000 for the same crime in the same court on August 11, 2009, and on March 9, 2013, the Defendant operated a car in B, under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.141% while under the influence of alcohol concentration of KRW 0.141% without obtaining a driver’s license at the entrance of the parking lot around the 201-dong underground parking lot around 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on detection of drivers, circumstantial report on drivers, and the register of drivers' licenses;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry report, an investigation report, 201 high-level 201 high-level 207, 2009 high-level 2009 high-level 1359 Acts and subordinate statutes governing summary orders;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., the fact that the defendant has led to confession and reflect, and has driven a short distance in the course of waiting for a substitute driver);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;