However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who works in a building site.

On June 19, 2013, at around 06:23, the Defendant used the victim D (the aged 55) who worked together with the head of the team at the construction site, as one hand, on the ground that the victim D (the aged 55) was not paid wages properly to the Defendant, which is a dangerous object from chemical (the length of 45 cm) and used the victim as another hand, to “be dead,” and used the victim’s breath in a dub, and used the victim’s dub, thereby breaking it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol prepared by the police as to D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see the following reasons for sentencing)

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture [decision of a sentence] violent crime, assault crime, Type 1 (Specially Convicted Person]: Penalty not, deadly Weapons and other dangerous articles carried with him/her, and committing a crime [decision of the area of recommendation] basic area (decision of the area of recommendation], and standards for suspension of execution of imprisonment for not less than 2 months and not more than 10 months];

1. Major reasons for entry: A crime by carrying a deadly weapon or other dangerous articles with him/her, and a person not subject to punishment;

2. Reasons for writing in general: At least two times of suspension of execution, previous convictions, strong reflects (decision of sentence) (decision of convictions) are divided and reflected in the Defendant’s criminal act in this case; the degree of assault is relatively minor; the victim does not want criminal punishment against the Defendant by mutual consent with the victim; the relationship between the Defendant and the victim; the background leading up to the instant criminal act; the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment; and various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments in this case, such as the background leading up to the instant criminal act; the Defendant’s age; and