The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the portion without charge) on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the credibility of the victim’s statement, degree of proof for conviction, and the crime of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes

In addition, examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the evidence duly admitted, it is just that the court below imposed an order of disclosure and notification for a period of five years on the ground that the defendant should not disclose personal information to the public, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.