The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have convicted the Defendants of the charges on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In doing so, there is no error of misapprehending the legal principles regarding the use of the name, name name, joint principal, and prohibition of analogical interpretation, etc. of the production facilities for products manufactured by persons with severe disabilities under Article 9(2) and (3) of the Special Act on the Purchase of Products with severe disabilities, contrary to logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.