If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

"2017 Highest 107"

1. On December 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) cut off the victim D’s cash amounting to KRW 2,000, No. 3 copies of the No. 3 card; and (b) one copy of the resident registration certificate, etc., on the market price, which includes one copy of the victim D’s 2,000 won; (c) 3 copies of the No. 3 card; and (d) one copy of the resident registration certificate.

2. On December 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stolen a victim F, a victim F, who was in a shopping mall located in the Ga art room operated by the Ga art room operated by the Ga art room operated by the 1st apartment of the Gangnam-si, Gangwon-si; (b) with one cellphone in an amount equivalent to KRW 500,000, in the market price of the victim’s possession.

On July 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) had the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value despite the absence of any money in the number at the main point of the J’s operation of the victim I located at Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of 2017; (b) deceiving the victim as if he had the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value; and (c) had the victim been granted property equivalent to KRW 14,00,000, a total of the market value of KRW 14,000, market price of which is equivalent to KRW 4,000, market price of 100.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 107"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police preparation with respect to F;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Photographs of damaged articles, on-site photographs " 2017 Highest 323";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement to be prepared;

1. Application of simplified receipts, on-site photographs statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act (a point of view), Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of view in fraud), and each fine for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: although the defendant again committed the crime of this case without being aware of the period of repeated crime, the defendant's mistake is against himself/herself, the degree of damage is not severe, and in the case of larceny, the damage was returned to the victims; the age, sex behavior, environment, method and consequence of the crime;