If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 9, 2012, at around 05:04, the Defendant reported as 112 the remainder of 112, G, the driver of the cleaning vehicle belonging to the E company, who is a driver of the cleaning vehicle belonging to the E company, who was operating on the street in front of the D in Ulsan-gu C, Ulsan-gu.

The Defendant demanded a slope I belonging to the H District of the Ulsannam Police Station H District of the Ulsannam Police Station, which was called upon the above report at the above time and at the above place, and the driver of the cleaning vehicle to take a drinking test because the driver of the cleaning vehicle was under the influence of drinking.

Therefore, although the Rabling J conducted a measurement against the above G as a drinking-free measuring, it was demanded to re-measurement the so-called so-called so-called the so-called so-called "d" test, and it was confirmed by using the so-called so-called so-called "d" reduction,

Accordingly, while the above Gyeong did not get a sense of drinking, the defect that the defendant tried to return the driver of the cleaning vehicle, the defendant made several calls via the 112 reporting center without the mind of the handling of the case, and the above Gyeong Gyeong J made a bath to the 112 reporting center, such as "I am fribly drinking sofrien in E", and the spiting spiting the head in the front of the above Gyeong J, booming the head into the face of J, pushed the body of the J on the back of the J, booming the frith, booming the body of the above J, and preventing the operation of the patrol vehicle by blocking the front of the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the J as a public official who performs his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement to J;

1. Each statement G and K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.