하자보수보증금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article
2. This Court shall have "this Court" as "the first instance court", and "Appraiser" as "the first instance court appraiser" collectively.
4. [Attachment 2] The detailed list of defect repair expenses shall be added as follows:
According to the result of the second request for supplementation and supplementation to appraiser A of the first instance court of the first instance of the second instance of the second instance of the second instance of the second instance of the second instance of the second instance of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the
8,646,308 51,778,344 73,652 - 1,375,592 1,691,541,544 176,387,150 stated as KRW 176,387,151 according to the result of the second entrustment of the expert witness A by the first instance court, but is 176,387,150.
Comprehensively taking into account the results of the appraisal of defects by the appraiser A of the first instance court in the part for public use and the results of the second appraisal of the first instance court in the second instance court in the first instance court, the appraiser of the first instance court recognized 497,492 won as the repair cost for the defects in the omission of construction of the road separation line and the ground parking lot parking line in the common area on January 8, 198, but recognized 31,808 won in the table, 465,684 won in the difference, and 2.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.2.2.0, the defects in the entire height of the underground parking lot floor in the underground parking lot were assessed as the defects that occurred before the inspection of the first appraisal, and thus, the defect repair 1,714,910 won in the previous part for the defect repair before the inspection of the second instance.