[2014 Highest 424] The Defendant searched and confirmed a sign of sale of used cars in a used vehicle trading company via the Internet (the conviction on February 14, 2014) and posted a new sign of sale on the Internet as Defendant’s one-way owner or an owner acting as an intermediary for sale on behalf of the owner. The Defendant posted a new sign of sale on the Internet as if Defendant’s one-way owner owns a vehicle, and then, posted a new sign of sale on the part of Defendant’s side to the victims who expressed their intention to purchase, with the intention to verify the actual sales of used vehicles in which the victims expressed their intention to purchase the sign of sale, and to take a look at the actual sales company of used vehicles in which the victims expressed their right to sell and take a look at ownership, and to withdraw money from the victims by using a so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the one-called “the one-called “the one-called “the one-called “the one-way”)” in order to immediately withdraw money from the victims and the victim’s.

1. The Defendant conspired with CX and CY as above. Accordingly, CY, on March 21, 2013, was posted on the Internet bulletin board by the Defendant and CX, and as a result, BMW520, which was stored at the victim CZ, was carried out by the Defendant, and 41 million won was remitted to the Defendant’s vehicle.