However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the owner of the 3th floor above the above studio in the public room room in the public room room, and the above studio can reside with 5 households including the defendant. For cooking, there is a gas pipeline facility that supplies the above studio outside the above studio to the combustionr inside the studio, and there is a studio in order to block the supply of liquefied petroleum gas in the middle of the above gas pipeline.

On September 2014, the Defendant removed the relevant gas studio in order to replace the existing gas studio that was used by connecting to the above gas pipe facilities with the electric studio.

Since liquefied petroleum gas leakage is a very dangerous substance for explosion if it is leaked, the users of liquefied petroleum gas facilities have a duty of care to remove gas bags connected to gas pipeline facilities as above, to ensure that gas facility installers equipped with professional skills and qualifications do so so so as not to leak liquefied petroleum gas from gas pipelines exposed due to removal of gas bags. In addition, the users of liquefied petroleum gas have a duty of care to manage it so that liquefied petroleum gas is not leaked by maintaining it in a locked state.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not require a gas facility construction contractor to remove the above gas dust, and did not take a normal finishing measure on the gas pipeline exposed thereby. In addition, the Defendant’s negligence by neglecting the above cock while leaving it open. On December 20, 2014, on a liquefied petroleum gas container connected to the above cock 101, the liquefied petroleum gas, which flow into the above cock 101, through the gas pipeline installed in the above cock, was explosiond due to incombustibility.

After all, the Defendant spreads liquefied petroleum gas, which is an explosive object, by the above negligence.