게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, the above provisions are applicable to the defendants for two years from the date of the conclusion of the judgment.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On October 17, 2019, Defendant A was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution due to quasi-indecent act by force at the Jeonju District Court on October 17, 2019, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 25, 2019.
【Criminal Facts】
C is a person who actually manages and operates a game room E from May 2, 2018 to September 5, 2019, such as the employment and management of employees of a game room, and the settlement of profits, in which he/she is in the second floor E, and Defendant B is a person who works for the game room from July 2018 to September 5, 2019, and Defendant A as an employee of each of the above game centers from September 2018 to July 2019.
No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.
Nevertheless, when the defendants and C are requested to exchange points obtained through games from many unspecified customers who visited the game site, the defendants and C shall inform C of the above customers, and C shall calculate the difference between the points obtained by the above customers after deducting 10% of the fee from the points obtained by the above customers, and shall gather them by cash exchange cycle.
After that, from May 2018 to September 5, 2019, the Defendants and C set up 150 game machine units for six types of games, such as “New r.son”, “Yew r.”, “Yew r.”, “Yeman”, “Arazker”, “Pr. New Sea”, and “Pr.2” in the above E game from May 2018 to September 5, 2019, and exchanged them in cash by calculating the difference after deducting 10% of the fee from the points points (the number of points points and cash is the same as 1:1).
As a result, the Defendants conspired with C to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police officer against the Defendants.