On May 23, 2011, the Defendant: (a) at the D office located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon; (b) even if the Defendant purchased a middle and high-class vehicle in installments, it was thought that the vehicle would be loaned by transferring it to E, a borrower, etc.; and (c) despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the installment payment for the vehicle, he/she did not intend to operate the vehicle, the Defendant paid the employee in charge of the victim Aju Capital Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “I would pay 764,220 won each month for 36 months from June 8, 2011 to May 8, 2014; and (d) provided that “I would pay 18,500,000 won for the vehicle with the victim and the 764,220 won each month from June 8, 2011 to May 8, 2014; and (d) concluded a contract with the victim to purchase the remaining 360,50150,70000 won for the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The fifth police suspect examination protocol against the accused;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. A loan agreement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 5,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act) (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act) provides that the profits gained in relation to the instant case are merely 1.9 million won, since the Defendant was unable to receive the amount promised by