When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person running a city bus B.

On October 31, 2015, the Defendant driven the above city bus on October 31, 2017, while driving it on the 17:55, and, at the same time, proceeded to the fugitive underground roadway from the wall of the flying distance.

Since the location is an intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by proceeding in accordance with signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the part of the lower part of the D-si’s left-hand part of the D-si, which is driven by the victim C (62 Do) in accordance with the signals from the shooting distance to the right-hand side of the D-si, which was driven by the victim C (62 Do).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury of the victim C, such as a 2nd left-hand chill, which requires approximately 8 weeks of medical treatment, the injury of chills, tensions, etc., which requires approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment to the victim E (60 years of age), and the injury of the victim F (58 years of age) such as chills, tensions, and tensions, which require approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment to the victim F (58 years of age), respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol with regard to C by the police;

1. Police statements of E (the occurrence of traffic accidents);

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each medical certificate and medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is committed at the intersection by the defendant, who is an urban bus driver.