2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. From December 4, 2007 to December 18, 2007, the Plaintiff conducted a demonstration based on the side effects of the co-mar surgery in front of the D sexual surgery in the Dong-gu Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and the previous sexual surgery.

B. On December 6, 2007, when the Plaintiff was engaged in a demonstration before the above sexual out of Korea, a male on the name unexplosived in D’s name (the above male was identified as E) used to assault the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff reported the assault to the police, and the Defendant, a police officer belonging to the F police station, dispatched to the scene of the above case.

C. The Plaintiff entered D's sexual affairs department in order to comply with the circumstances where the accident occurred, and the Plaintiff entered D's room, and the Plaintiff, who was the nurse of the above sexual affairs, prevented the Plaintiff from entering the room, and there was a vagabonds between the Plaintiff and G. However, the Defendant observed the above situation at the time.

After December 4, 2007 and December 18, 2007, the Plaintiff was under investigation (No. 2008-type 3053 at the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office) and prosecuted (No. 2008-type 613 at the Gwangju District Court) for the following criminal charges. The Gwangju District Court rendered a judgment dismissing prosecution on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s testimony and Defendant’s testimony, etc., working for D, G’s testimony, and other nurses who worked in D, beyond D’s sexual character, were convicted of interference with their duties and injury among the charges, and committed a fine of no. 1.5 million won by recognizing that the Plaintiff was guilty of his/her testimony and Defendant’s testimony, etc., among the charges, and that the prosecution was withdrawn for defamation.

1. On December 4, 2007, the Plaintiff interfered with the business: (a) caused side effects after undergoing a cosexual surgery in the D sexual surgery; (b) distributed printed materials with the content of slandering D from the front of the above sexual surgery to the body; and (c) distributed printed materials stating, “D will have intentionally damaged his or her own nose,” and “D will intentionally interfered with his or her nose.” The Plaintiff spreads false facts by voice “D will intentionally interfered with his or her nose.”