The sentence of the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

Although the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, and returned most of the money and valuables received, the instant crime is acknowledged to have been committed by the Defendant, on the other hand, in light of the fact that the Defendant received money and valuables from the operators of the event agency and selected them as the proxy agency for the event of the instant university, there is no significant crime in light of the period of the instant crime, the number of crimes, and the number of crimes, etc., and the Defendant has the record of punishment for forging the documents under the name of the president of the instant university, and comprehensively considering all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, criminal records, and the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.