A. On October 13, 1993, the Namyang Housing Industry Co., Ltd., and the Plaintiff’s status as the Namyang Housing Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Namyang Housing Industry”) established a superstore of the size of 1st, 3rd, 7,228.85 square meters of the business site area, 6,960.43 square meters of the store area (hereinafter “previous building”) under the Distribution Industry Development Act with the trade name “C” in the name of the trade name of the 6, 1993, North-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter “instant land”). The Plaintiff is a merchant operating small stores in the neighboring area of the instant land, and is the chairperson of the D low-income group consisting of the merchants operating small stores in the neighboring area of the instant land.

B. On April 30, 2012, when applying for deliberation on a construction plan of the building plan of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building, the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of

Accordingly, the remaining housing industry requested a construction office of deep-friendly technology development to conduct a traffic impact assessment of new building construction. On October 2012, the defendant applied for a review of a construction plan along with a traffic impact assessment report, etc. on the defendant. On January 22, 2013, the North-gu Building Committee held a committee on January 22, 2013 and decided on the condition that "the plan should be modified by up to 10% of the existing area, and the landscape area should be secured in the entrance and exit area and the utilization level of the open vacant lot should be increased."

C. Application for a building permit for the remaining housing industry and the defendant's non-permission disposition.