2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant was waiting to commit the crime of this case, but the defendant has the criminal records of fines, suspension of execution, and punishment imposed several times for the same criminal acts; the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case again during the repeated crime due to the same criminal acts; the defendant does not seem to have made efforts to recover from damage; and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of each of the crimes of this case; and all of the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, are considered appropriate, and it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.