When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 13, 2014, from around 20:30 to around 00:45 on January 14, 2014, the Defendant obstructed disturbance, such as drinking alcohol from “D key points” of the victim C’s operation in Chuncheon City, drinking alcohol to customers of other table B, drinking alcohol to the victim, preventing the victim from doing so, and making the victim take a bath to the victim, driving the entrance, driving the door, and significantly sound.

The Defendant, by force, interfered with the victim’s operation of the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that there was an agreement with the victim for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, five months of imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of performance of official duties in 2008, one year of suspended execution, and six times of a fine for insult from 2000 to 2012, and two times of a fine for the crime of insult, etc. The double previous departments have history of serving two times of the crime of interference with business in two times in 201 and two million won. It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.