상해
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
1. On December 29, 2016, the Defendant, around 13:00 on December 29, 2016, committed an injury on the part of the victim E (61 aged) in front of the Defendant’s residential gate located in the front Northern-gun of North Korea, on the ground that the Defendant refused the request for eviction by the victim E (61) in front of the Defendant’s residential gate, thereby pushing the victim’s breast part of the breast part of the Defendant, and walking twice the chest part of the Defendant’s breast part of the Defendant, thereby causing about two weeks of treatment, such as a string wall, which requires approximately
2. Determination
A. The gist of the defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense room to the victim's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defense room was
B. 1) The defendant's statement is made in the investigative agency of the victim and in this court, as direct evidence that corresponds to the defendant's chest part of the victim's chest part was costed twice by the defendant's birth.
2) However, comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances admitted as evidence by this Court as evidence, it is difficult to believe the victim’s statement as it is.
① At the initial police station, the victim stated that he was fryed by the Defendant’s chest at the bar of the Defendant, and that he was fryed by the Defendant, and that he was fryed by the Defendant, and that he was not fryed by the Defendant. ② After which he was investigated by the Defendant at the police station, he was fryed by the Defendant, who did not comply with the demand to leave, and the Defendant was fryed by the Defendant’s chest, and the Defendant was fying out of the gate, and the Defendant was fryed by price of the breast, and the Defendant was fying out of the floor, and the Defendant was fyed by the Defendant who was fyed by the Defendant.
In this Court, the defendant stated in this Court, and iii) under this Court, he was at the price of his chest on his own.