beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.04.03 2013고정849

사기등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 8, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) at the Cheongju District Court on November 8, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 12, 2013, and on August 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for an escape of an offender at the Suwon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 13, 2014.

1. On February 21, 2012, the Defendant and C in the use of the private document forgery and the use of the falsified-gu private document forgery and the use of the falsified-gu Da 103 E, and on February 21, 2012, the Defendant presented the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificate to E, and the Defendant presented that “A shall create two mobile phones in the name of the Gu, Do, Do,” and the Defendant submitted “G: G, resident registration number: Ha, and the bank name of the applicant for automatic transfer: Nonghyup, the bank name of the applicant for automatic transfer: Agricultural, the account holder A, the account number: J: Ka, the customer registration number of the applicant: Ma, and the customer column, signed by G, and submitted it to E as genuinely constituted.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with C, forged two new service contracts in the name of G, a private document on rights and duties, and exercised them for the purpose of exercising them.

2. Although the Defendant conspired with C to open a mobile phone at the same time and at the above place, even if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the said fees, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim EK Telecom Co., Ltd., and opened two mobile phones (K and L) in the name of G; (b) did not pay a total of 2,190,620 won from around that time to September 11, 2012; and (c) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the statement on the fourth trial date);

1. Statements made by witnesses E and details of recording stored in computer disks in the third protocol of the trial;

1. The prosecution against some of the defendants, including the protocol of interrogation of suspects, and C.