도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on January 26, 2017 to one-year imprisonment with labor for a violation of road traffic law (unlicensed driving) at the Suwon District Court on the grounds of a violation of road traffic law at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong District Court on February 3, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 3,
[Criminal facts] On April 12, 2017, the Defendant driven a C-wing truck without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 100 meters in front of the 576-ro 576-ro 100 meters in volume from the road in front of the Ro-maart, a 425 U.S. agricultural cooperative, one of the U.S. agricultural cooperatives, to the front of the Ro-maart at the same time.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Report on the state of driver’s license without any changes and the ledger of driver’s licenses;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (Attachment to the judgment of the same type of punishment case);
1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. The sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, under the grounds for the selective sentencing of imprisonment, shall be determined in the same manner as the order, taking into account the following circumstances:
- The sentence of sentence is inevitable because not only has been punished several times for the same crime but also has been committed again during the period of suspension of execution, since the crime without the license of this case was committed again during the suspension of execution. However, there are some points to consider the circumstances of the driving without the license of this case and the distance of driving is not different. - The defendant is against his mistake.