However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 16, 2015, the Defendant was suffering from disturbance as a matter of time for hotel staff and charge from D’s 1st floor in Busan Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City D’s Da-dong C’s 1st floor, on December 16, 2015, on the ground that “F of the police station affiliated with the Busan Dong-dong Police Station E division in Busan, which was called upon receiving 112 a report, shall be deemed to be a joint liquidation either at the competent authorities or the house.”

Chewing, she considered that the police officer “I will take care of her, she will do so immediately, she will do so, she will do so,” and assaulted the face of the police officer at hand, she will injure the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused;

1. Application of the respective statement protocol and investigation report (No. 2) statute to G and F

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the Order to Attend Education [the scope of the recommended sentence] The execution of imprisonment shall be postponed by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) there is no basic area (six months to one year and four months) (the person who has been subject to special sentencing] (the decision of sentencing] (the decision of sentencing has no record of being punished due to interference with the performance of official duties; (b) there is no record of being punished due to interference with the performance of official duties; (c) it reflect