When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. The Defendant, around April 12, 2016, found one set of a log distance in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on April 12, 2016, where the market price contained in the victim C’s identification card, KB national card, and 1 physical card is unknown.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. Fraud;

A. On April 12, 2016, the Defendant, at around 12:24, 2016, presented to the “E convenience store” located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (a) completed the KB national card embezzled as described in paragraph (1) as if the Defendant was a legitimate holder; and (b) was issued a tobacco equivalent to KRW 4,500 at the market price, which is the owner of the convenience store, to the employees of the convenience store whose name is unknown.

B. On April 12, 2016, at around 13:22, the Defendant presented to the “G cafeteria” located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu Seoul, the Defendant: (a) completed the KB national card embezzled as described in paragraph (1) as if the Defendant was the lawful holder; and (b) was provided with alcohol and food equivalent to KRW 93,00,00, the owner of the said restaurant business, as if the Defendant was the victimized employee.

(c)

around 13:31 on April 12, 2016, the Defendant presented at “I convenience store” located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, the KB national card, as described in paragraph 1, to an employee who was embezzled as a legitimate holder, and whose name is unknown, and was issued 3 A tobacco equivalent to 12,700 won at the market price of the convenience store owner as the victim of the above convenience store.

(d)

The Defendant, at “J’s main point,” where the address on April 12, 2016 is unknown, refers to the employees whose name is unknown, as described in paragraph 1, who completed the KB’s national card embezzled as if the Defendant was a legitimate holder.