근로기준법위반등
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is an operator of the D Company and E, which is the same place of business with the 3th floor of the CG building, and employs 10 full-time workers, and operates the periodical manufacturing business, etc. on November 17, 2012. From November 20, 2012 to November 2, 2012, the Defendant did not pay 1,308,960 won for the unpaid annual paid leave in 2010 for the retired workers F, and 1,514,80 won for the unused annual paid leave in 2011; 1,514,80 won for the unused annual paid leave in 203; 4,422,80 won for the unpaid paid leave in 208; 31,701,849 won for the previous paid leave in 200 days to the 194th annual paid leave in 2010 to the 2014th annual paid leave in 198.
2. Crimes of non-prosecution for judgment: Judgment dismissing public prosecution pursuant to Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act, and Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, where workers under the proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits have expressed their wish to punish each