However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant entered Korea on March 14, 2017, as Malaysia national tourists, for tourism purposes.

1. On March 15, 2017, at the main point of “D” located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 04:41 on March 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim E (25 knife) who is a customer of this tobacco using the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

2. Around 07:20 on the same day, the Defendant, in front of the room where the victim H (W, 22 years of age) and I (n, 22 years of age) live in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, opened a entrance where the victims did not correct for the purpose of theft by using the gap in the victim I (n, 22 years of age), and intrudes into the room where the victims occupied by the victims, and then cut off the victim's H with one blus strus stacker and one 20,000 won of the market price of the victim's H in the room, and one brus 80,000 won of the market price, and one 20,000 won of the mobile phone charging machine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each statement of E, H, I, and J;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol and the statutes on the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Articles 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspended sentence is that the Defendant committed a larceny in succession on the same day, and in particular, in the lusium, it is not easy to impose liability on the Defendant in that he commits a larceny by intrusion upon another person’s room.