(a) Business approval and public notice - Housing site development project: housing site development project (L district first and second education of housing site development projects; hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant on March 23, 201: Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs) on September 21, 201;

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on December 19, 2013 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”) - Land to be expropriated: The land to be expropriated is indicated in the column for “subject to expropriation” in attached Table 2.

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands,” and individually referred to as “instant lands,” depending on the parcel number - Compensation for losses: The phrase “amount of adjudication for expropriation” in attached Table 2 is as indicated.

- 수용개시일: 2014. 2. 11. - 감정평가법인: <1차> ㈜ 경일감정평가법인, 한국감정원 〈2차〉㈜ 하나감정평가법인, ㈜ 제일감정평가법인

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on June 19, 2014 (hereinafter “instant objection”) - Compensation for losses: As indicated in the “amount of objection” column in attached Table 2.

- 감정평가법인: <1차> ㈜ 삼창감정평가법인, ㈜ 중앙감정평가법인 〈2차〉㈜ 가람감정평가법인, ㈜ 에이원감정평가법인 (이하 위 이의재결의 감정평가법인 모두를 ‘각 재결감정인’이라 하고, 그 감정결과를 ‘각 재결감정’이라 한다) [인정근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제1 내지 4호증, 을 제1 내지 3호증(가지번호 있는 것은 가지번호 각 포함, 이하 같다)의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The amount of compensation for losses caused by the plaintiffs' alleged acceptance ruling should be increased since it was erroneously selected as a comparative standard or excessively underassessment because it was not properly assessed due to the lack of good faith.

B. The instant judgment and the court’s appraisal were assessed as appropriate without any illegality in the assessment methods.