재임용거부처분취소결정의 취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the decision;
A. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) was newly appointed as a cultural or full-time lecturer at A University (hereinafter referred to as the “instant University”) operated by the school juristic person C (hereinafter referred to as the “instant school juristic person”) as of February 28, 1995, with the employment period fixed on March 1, 1993 as of February 28, 1995. On March 1, 1995, the employment period was up to February 28, 1997, and was appointed as the Director of the Cultural and Cultural Department. On April 1, 2004, the employment period was up to March 31, 2010, and was appointed as an associate professor until August 31, 2016.
B. On April 29, 2016, the Plaintiff provided an intervenor with guidance for re-election upon expiration of the term of appointment, and the intervenor filed an application for deliberation on re-election with the pertinent university.
C. On June 17, 2016, the University Teachers Personnel Committee of this case, which was held on June 17, 2016, decided not to request the renewal of an intervenor on the ground of the lack of the basic points for reappointment (B grade and 60 points or more) under Article 14(2) of the Regulations on the Evaluation of Teachers’ Duties and Article 5 of the Enforcement Rule of the Regulations on the Evaluation of Teachers’ Duties. The board of directors of the instant school foundation decided not to request the renewal of the intervenor on June 25, 2016. The Plaintiff notified the intervenor of his refusal to re-appoint the intervenor on June 30, 2016.
(hereinafter “instant disposition rejecting reappointment”) D.
On July 20, 2016, an intervenor appealed and filed a petition review with the Defendant seeking revocation of the Plaintiff’s disposition rejecting re-employment of the instant case. On October 19, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision to revoke the disposition rejecting re-employment of the instant case against the Intervenor on the following grounds (hereinafter “instant decision”).
- With respect to the absence of the allocation of social welfare and lectures or guidance students from September 1, 2008 by the Intervenor, there is no dispute between the Parties.
- The criteria for the examination of reappointment of the university of this case shall facilitate the work as a faculty member of the relevant department.