A. Defendant B, C, D, and E jointly share KRW 45,00,000 and Defendant B with respect thereto. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27806, Oct. 26, 2016>

A. Defendant B, C, and D, on September 201, 1, 201, concluded that Defendant B would have been 10 million won to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B would have been able to live in F. Although the house owner demanded KRW 100 million from KRW 7 million to KRW 7.5 million, Defendant C and D would have been able to bring 10 million to the house owner. Although the house owner was small, Defendant C and D would have been 10 million to be 10 million and would have been 10 million from KRW 7.0,000,000, and they would have been 10,000,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,00 won.

B. On September 26, 2011, Defendant C and D stated that “A person shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount of money to be collected in G in the following month if he/she borrowed KRW 2 million as he/she paid the money in the following month.” However, even if Defendant C did not have the money to be collected in G in the following month, even if he/she did not receive any other domestic support money, it cannot be used individually, and there was no other personal property. However, even if he/she borrowed money from the Plaintiff, he/she did not have the intent or ability to repay it in the following month. 2) The Plaintiff deposited KRW 2 million in the new bank account in Defendant D’s name on September 27, 2011.

(c) related;