To order the defendant to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

The defendant was a person who operated the C 2 points in Ansan-si, and the victim D (F, name, and age 25) was a person who worked in the above C as a health trap.

At around 20:00 on August 23, 2019, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by force on the victim’s chests in the PT room at around 20:00, when he was asked to ask the damaged to the end of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each recording recording of D’s legal statement and each investigation report (Evidence Nos. 4, 5 of the evidence list) [Defendant and defense counsel] asserted that, although the Defendant received from the injured party the complete completion of the statement, the Defendant did not have any fact that the injured party’s her her her her her her her her her her her her

From this process of investigation to this court, the victim demanded a sexual relationship to the effect that the Defendant “Ba person who ever bath and bath,” among the attempts to receive the victim from the injured on August 23, 2019, made a relatively consistent statement to the effect that: (a) the victim refused to do so; (b) the victim bath by inserting her hand towards the lower half of the victim; and (c) the victim her body caused the victim’s chest to turn her chest.

It is highly reliable in that the victim's statement is not capable of being experienced directly and specifically, as well as the date and place of the crime, the details and method of the crime, and the situation after the crime, etc., are inconsistent with each other or inconsistent with the empirical rule, and the circumstances leading to the statement and the attitude of the statement in the court can not be found at all influence of the nature.

On August 29, 2019, after six (6) days from the date of the instant crime, the Defendant, in the course of a conversation with the victim, " how much she would have left her her fluor," was fluored to her fluor, so why the fluor's fluor's fluor'

199,000

We can see, Nado.