공무집행방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant, refusing to withdraw on October 26, 2017, was under the influence of alcohol in the “D cafeteria” operated by the victim C located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan around October 26, 2017, and used the toilet.
In spite of the victim's refusal to do so, the victim has neglected it and entered the toilet and opened the door.
At the same time, the toilets are located inside the restaurant, and there is only one column, so the other customers could not use the toilet at all. Therefore, the defendant was demanded to request the victim to leave the toilet, and the defendant was demanded to request again from the victim at around 18:40 on the same day as the defendant did not respond to the request.
However, the Defendant did not respond to the request, and the police officer sent to the victim's report at around 18:50 on the same day, sent to the victim's meeting with a large interest until the police officer arrives, and started to come up with the toilet door so that he can look to other customers. On the other hand, the Defendant appeared to go up with the victim's request for withdrawal without good cause.
2. Around 18:50 on the same day as above 18:50 days, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by speaking to the victim at the victim’s 3-4 location, such as the above C and the customer, on the ground that the victim F, a guard belonging to the Busan East Police Station E District, who was called to the Busan East Police Station, demanded the escape of the victim.
3. The Defendant was notified by the above F that he was arrested as an offender of the crime of obstruction of duties and insult on the ground that he did not comply with the demand to leave the workplace at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place as mentioned in the foregoing paragraph 2, and expressed to F of the developments leading up to being called up with a large interest, he could be punished for the crime of insult, even though he was given a warning that he could not be punished for the crime of insult.
The defendant sent F's face one time as a drink between F and F's notification of the doctrine of f. The defendant was called together with F's face.