beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.11.11 2016가단8771

건물명도 등

Text

1. The defendant

가. 별지목록 기재 건물 1층 중 별지도면 표시 ①,②,③,④,⑤,⑥,⑦,⑧,⑨...

Reasons

1. 인정사실 원고는 2015. 2. 25. 별지 목록 기재 부동산 1층 중 별지도면 표시 ①,②,③,④,⑤,⑥,⑦,⑧,⑨,⑩,⑪,⑫,⑬,⑭,⑮,①의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 (가)부분 62.65㎡(103호, 이하, 이 사건 부동산이라고 한다)에 관하여 피고와 사이에 임대차보증금을 1,000만 원, 월 임대료를 90만 원, 임대차기간을 2015. 5. 18.부터 2017. 5. 17.까지로 정하여 임대차계약을 체결하였다.

From September 18, 2015, the Defendant continued to delay the payment of rent from September 18, 2015 to around the closing date of the instant argument.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, purport of whole pleadings

2. As of the filing date of the instant suit, the Defendant failed to pay two or more rents. Accordingly, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of his/her intention to terminate the instant lease agreement by serving a duplicate of the instant complaint, and thus, the lease agreement on the instant real estate was lawfully terminated on the date on which the duplicate of the instant complaint was served on the Defendant.

Therefore, barring special circumstances, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and to pay to the Plaintiff the overdue rent and unlawful gains equivalent to the rent in arrears calculated by the ratio of KRW 900,000 per month from September 18, 2015 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.