If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

No one shall provide game products for distribution or use which have not been classified by the Game Rating Board, or display or keep such products for such purposes.

Nevertheless, from the beginning of February 2013 to May 22:2, 2013, the Defendant established one game machine for “matomato” and one game machine for “matomatoma”, the rating classification of which was refused by the Game Rating Board, on which the Defendant kept each of them to provide for the use of an unspecified number of customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. The application of statutes on the list of seizure requests for appraisal, field photographs, copies of the real estate lease contract, records of seizure, and the list of seizure;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, and Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 1 of the Act on the Selection and Promotion of the Game Industry, and Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 44 (2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry, Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. No person who outlines the facts charged shall provide game products for the purpose of distribution or use, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Rating Board, or display or keep such products for such purpose;

Nevertheless, from the beginning of February 2013 to May 22:2, 2013, the Defendant respectively set up 30 game equipment, which is different from the contents classified by the Game Rating Board, 30 game equipment, and 10 game equipment, “WATPP-B,” which are different from the contents classified by the Game Rating Board, and stored each in order to provide them to unspecified multiple customers.

2. The Defendant and the defense counsel can replace the Defendant with the other game machine on the ground that the Defendant was doing business by installing a sobroman 2 game machine and WAER-B game machine, and the customer did not have any presence.