A. In full view of the facts that there is no dispute between the parties, and the purport of the entire argument in the statement in subparagraph 1, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the Defendant the sum of KRW 20 million on September 14, 2012, and KRW 50 million on September 27, 2012, and KRW 50 million on September 26, 2012, and the Defendant agreed to return the amount until September 26, 2013. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 50 million per annum as prescribed by the Civil Act from September 28, 2013 to January 16, 2018, and KRW 15% per annum as the Plaintiff seeks.

B. As to this, the Defendant asserted that the above KRW 50 million was an investment loan, not a loan, and thus, the Plaintiff cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim. However, as alleged by the Defendant, even if the above amount was an investment loan, according to the above fact of recognition, the Defendant appears to have decided to return the above amount until September 26, 2013, and the Defendant did not dispute this fact, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is rejected.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.