However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 5, 2020, at around 22:59, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 to “C” that “a drunk customer requests tobacco without paying money; (b)” the Defendant separated the Defendant from the reporter, and (c) the police officer affiliated with the D Zone D Zone of the Kim Sea Police Station, the Jung-gu Police Station, and the EF entered the convenience store to listen to the reporter’s statement, but the police officer called the above E, who left the front of the convenience store, stated that “I am asked, I am path, I am path, and I am the face of the above E at the right time.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers who perform legitimate duties on the handling of 112 reported cases, thereby hindering the execution of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to G, H, and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act has the record of probation for the defendant due to the same crime, and other various sentencing factors in the trial process of this case, including the nature of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account the following factors.