1. On September 3, 2012, at around 13:00, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the locked gate was emitted from the victim D’s house in Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-gu; (b) confirmed that the locked gate was removed from the lock gate once again; and (c) entered the victim’s house at the victim’s house at the victim’s house at the victim’s house at the victim’s house at the place where the gate was removed from the lock gate; and (d) stolen one 1,70,000 won in total and one 1,70,000 won in the market price owned by the victim’s house at the victim’s seat at the victim’s house at the victim’s seat; and (c) cut it with 1,360,000 won in cash.

2. On April 25, 2018, around 13:50 on April 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) confirmed locked capitals from the victim F, located in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, to have no way inside the house; (b) removed the lock locking device by walking the gate once again; (c) then entered the victim’s house inside the house to have the victim removed the lock locking device; and (d) one, 1,05,00 won in total of the market prices owned by the victim during the cremation at the place of cremation; (b) one, 18 k gold pool; (c) one, 18 k gold pool; and (d) four k gold ingles, both of which were stolen by the victims during the same period from November 2016 to January 1, 2016, and invaded the victims’ property at the same time during the same period.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolens the victims' property and intrudes the victims' residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Each statement of F, D, L, M, N, andO;

1. Investigation report (verification of the amount of damage) and investigation report (the head of a tax office shall attach copies of a bank purchase price);

1. On-site evidence photographs, and copies and photographs of the purchasing paper;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to larceny is recognized in light of the method of crime, frequency of crime, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been repeated several times within a single time;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act (a point in Section 329), Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act (a point of habitual larceny) concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of intrusion upon each residence);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;