beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.26 2013가합515784

손해배상(기)

Text

1. As to Defendant B’s KRW 670,00,000 and KRW 300,000 among the Plaintiff, Defendant B’s KRW 50,000 from March 24, 2010 to KRW 50,000.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B and F acquired knowledge of the fact that Defendant B and F may purchase 100 apartment units of distributed G apartment units at 30% of the purchase price around April 2009, and participated in the purchase of apartment units of distributed G apartment units with Defendant E. In short, Defendant B and F failed to comply with the promise that Defendant E had brought about 30 households of distributed G apartment units. Defendant B and F failed to purchase through a through-sale apartment units. 2) Even after that, while continuing to purchase through-sale apartment units of distributed G apartment units, Defendant B and F could be allowed to sell through-sale apartment units of He room H apartment units on the first-come-served basis on February 2, 2010, by obtaining a balance certificate with J, and by taking it as security, KRW 10 million of the apartment units and KRW 260 million (hereinafter “60 million”).

F around February 2, 2010, around Seoul Jongno-gu, paid KRW 100 million to the introduction company that the apartment would be brought about in the bond office located in Jongno-gu Seoul K, but the purchase of the apartment house through the lock room H apartment was not made.

3) At the time of Defendant B and F’s process of purchasing a through sale apartment as above on February 2010, Defendant B and F failed to grasp the substance of the above apartment, and the unit and unit of the apartment to be purchased was not finalized. B. Around December 2009, the Plaintiff was introduced the F, her mother, through L having been aware of the fact that L and F’s apartment purchase was conducted.

The plaintiff was recommended to purchase one apartment house because he can purchase the apartment apartment distributed G apartment from L/F.

2) On February 2010, the Plaintiff is a household with a 34 square-type apartment in the sericultural room H, instead of purchasing G apartment distributed from L and F, (hereinafter “one household of sericultural apartment”).

C. The Plaintiff concluded a contract with the Plaintiff and F and paid the purchase price 1) on January 2010.