When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 3, 2015, the Defendant told the victim B at the mutual infinite coffee shop near Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, that “I would leave her finite as a job with the same letter as a public health clinic through a person who was finite and find to receive money.”

However, the defendant did not have any particular property, and did not pay the installment and monthly rent of cars properly, and even if he received money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to leave the victim's steering car.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 5 million over four times from March 2015 to the end of the police officer, and did not comply with the law and participated in the employment of others for profit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the law to the statement statement written by the police against B and C

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 107 and 9 of the Labor Standards Act (the point in which a person participates in the employment of another person for profit);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment provided for more severe fraud);

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the fact that the defendant has been sentenced to a fine of the same kind twice, but the number of times is different, the amount of damage of this case is limited to five million won, and the victim has paid a part of 1.5 million won to the victim before the closing of argument and has paid a certain amount of damage in cash on the date of this decision, and has agreed with the victim as a result of the additional payment, and the fact that the defendant

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;