beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.11 2012고단6127

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of Corporation D.

The Defendant purchased the victims E and Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu F, G, H, I, and J sites from the Military Mutual-Aid Association as a P.F. loan, and decided to operate a housing project.

On March 22, 2010, the Defendant, at the office of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office 301 K Building 301, stated, “Inasmuch as internal branch is between the head of the Military Mutual Aid Association’s Business Development Headquarters L, the 1 team leader M and the peace-friendly branch M, the Defendant may receive a P.F. loan from the Military Mutual Aid Association and promote our business successful. However, at present, other implementing companies are promoting the same business as our ongoing by investing 200 million won in the Military Mutual Aid Association as a teaching expense. Our company is entitled to a P.F. loan from the Military Mutual Aid Association, but the companies need to use 200 million won as a teaching expense and 100 million won as a teaching expense to the Military Mutual Aid Association.”

However, in fact, the defendant was fully met with L/M one to two times, and there was no other implementing company paid 200 million won to the Military Mutual Aid Association as school expenses, and even though he did not intend to deliver 100 million won to the Military Mutual Aid Association as school expenses, he was thought to use 300 million won by deceiving the victim for office rent, personal debt repayment, etc.

The Defendant received 100 million won from the victim, namely, i.e., 100 million won from the victim, 100 million won from the same place on March 30, 2010, 50 million won from the same place on April 14, 2010, and 30 million won in total under the same name at the same place on April 29, 2010.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. E’s legal statement;

1. N’s legal statement;

1. Some statements made by the prosecution concerning N in the prosecutor's statement;

1.A copy of a letter of certification of the same trade agreement;