When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person working for the “C” as an employee of the producer and producer who exports of leather and dies. D is the actual operator of the “E” (titler operator) chain, and G is an employee of the manufacturer, such as bamboo, operated by H, etc.

On April 22, 2014, the Defendant appeared at the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 4555, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court 157, 133734, which I raised against E, as a witness, at the Seoul Central District Court 2013Gadan 133734, which I raised against E, and stated that “G and D talked with E at the E neighboring coffee shop around November 30, 2012, and that G directly presented its tax invoice to D above and under the underground passage.”

However, on November 30, 2012, there was no fact that the Defendant dialogueed G and D at the E neighboring coffee shop, but there was no fact that G and G directly viewed the tax invoice to D.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement as a witness who has taken an oath under the law.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Each protocol of examination of witness;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to H;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Investigation report (to attach photographs of tax invoices for suppliers and suppliers of H);

1. The original copy and the tax invoice of letter bags [the defendant alleged that he delivered the tax invoice to D on November 30, 2012. However, D's tax invoice and registered mail bags are non-leeped, H, the president of the I president, made the tax invoice and sent the tax invoice to E by registered mail, and clearly stated that H did not have issued the same other tax invoice. H, in this court, was the first transaction with E on the day of the business of sending the tax invoice directly to the first transaction with E, and therefore H may have H paid the tax invoice directly to D.

A statement is made, but the first.